Hyper-Synthetic Data: The Future of Cybersecurity
Stay updated with us
Sign up for our newsletter
For years, legacy cybersecurity incumbents have leveraged vast proprietary datasets into unassailable competitive positions and significant market capitalizations. Conventional wisdom held that the more comprehensive a firm’s real-world incident and telemetry data, the greater its advantage.
That moat, as well as legacy cybersecurity companies’ continued dominance, is now in jeopardy.
Recent research from Gartner suggests that the future of cybersecurity will not be legacy companies relying on large, proprietary datasets, but more agile companies that can generate and simulate realistic cyber environments, model increasingly sophisticated adversary behavior, and stress-test emergent attack scenarios in ways real-world data simply cannot.
What Is Hyper-Synthetic Data (HSD)?
HSD is data generated purely by LLMs and other machine-learning models to exacting specifications for highly specific applications, including the simulation of cyberattack intrusions on enterprise-level systems.
As its name implies, HSD is entirely synthetic; it is not user-generated or reliant on any proprietary data a business may have at its disposal, and can be created to virtually any specification, business use-case, or industry vertical.
One of the key advantages offered by HSD is significant cost savings. Businesses seeking to evaluate their resilience from cyberattack no longer need to spend millions of dollars on costly, real-world proprietary datasets. HSD offers completely customizable datasets for virtually any simulation purpose, at a fraction of the cost, with none of the limitations of relying upon real-world incident data.
Proactive to Preemptive: How Is the Cybersecurity Industry Changing?
The rapid advancement of AI technologies is enabling threat actors to become more sophisticated than ever before, at a pace that once seemed unimaginable. At the same time, the attack surface is evolving quickly, and many of the most pressing cybersecurity threats organizations will face in the future may be entirely new and previously unseen.
This shift demands a fundamental change in how organizations prepare for and respond to cyberattacks and information security incidents. Just as the industry moved from a reactive to a proactive approach, cybersecurity leaders must now become preemptive—realistically simulating every conceivable threat scenario to stay ahead.
In 2025, HSD was used in just 15% of AI training data in the defense, manufacturing, and transportation sectors. Gartner predicts that figure will grow to 80% by 2030, representing a profound strategic shift in how organizations in a range of vital economic sectors and the national security community approach cybersecurity readiness.
What’s Driving This Shift in Cybersecurity?
The growing adoption of autonomous, agentic workflows is transforming how cybersecurity organizations approach threat detection and response in ways no previous technology has. For many organizations, especially those in national security and highly regulated industries, testing unproven agentic workflows in live production environments presents far too great a risk.
At the same time, large-scale AI automation is fundamentally reshaping cybersecurity by enabling new and emergent threats. The risk of novel attacks has never been higher, and many organizations are not prepared for the scale or sophistication of the threats now targeting their attack surfaces. Adversaries are developing new methods to probe and exploit institutional weaknesses, including token exhaustion attacks, in which AI agents are used to deplete an organization’s token allowance within a given period before the real attack begins. This tactic, which closely resembles the DDoS attacks of previous years, is just one example of the new strategies cybersecurity professionals are being forced to adapt to in near real time.
Perhaps the single most important shift in cybersecurity today is the urgent need to develop institutional cultures of preemptive defense and mitigation. It is simply no longer sufficient for organizations to identify and respond to cyber threats, no matter how rapid those responses may be, and doing so is a losing battle that risks untold financial and reputational damage. Combating emergent threats, however, demands datasets that often do not yet exist, particularly in sectors such as national security, healthcare, and finance in which data is either tightly regulated or simply unavailable. This is where HSD shines, and why specialists who can create and tailor HSD to these threats are uniquely positioned to disrupt the dominance of incumbent legacy cybersecurity firms.
The Need for AI Proving Grounds
To deploy AI agents safely and effectively in production systems, organizations need testing environments where agents can be trained securely, their behavior can be validated, and their performance can be measured against demanding adversarial scenarios. These environments enable teams to benchmark effectiveness, continuously refine agentic workflows against novel and emerging threats, and demonstrate readiness and reliability before deployment to production.
This demand is increasing the need for custom cyber ranges and synthetic network infrastructure that can realistically simulate threats across an organization’s technology landscape without exposing sensitive or proprietary data to unproven agentic workflows.
New Threats Demand New Approaches
As Gartner’s research makes clear, both disruptors and legacy incumbents are already moving to incorporate HSD into their workflows and product offerings. The difference is not whether they are adopting it, but how quickly and how effectively they can act.
Many legacy vendors may be experimenting with HSD, but experimentation is no longer enough. Too many still lack the realistic infrastructure modeling required to simulate the emergent risks now threatening modern IT environments. They fall short on advanced adversary emulation, leaving organizations to train against threat actors far less sophisticated than the ones they are increasingly likely to face. They also lack the continuous validation workflows needed to uncover logic weaknesses and decision-making failures before those weaknesses are exploited.
HSD may be synthetic, but the threats it must prepare organizations for are not. In today’s cybersecurity landscape, realism and fidelity are no longer optional—they are essential. The window to prepare is closing quickly, and the gap between those who are ready and those who are vulnerable is only getting wider.
